Thursday, January 17, 2013

Cry Bullshit, and Restrain the Dogs of War!!

Another hotspot in the war on terror has flared up. It’s been brewing for about a year now, but is just starting to find space in the western consciousness. Fighting for headline prominence with Lance Armstrong’s blood chemistry and the US gun control debate.

Mali, the West African, former French colony, has been struggling with hard line militant Islamists occupying its broad northern territory. If you haven’t yet read up on it, CNN has a decent synopsis here: Mali  

Add this to the never ending problems in Afghanistan, ongoing problems in Syria, destabilizing factors in Yemen and Pakistan, and still fragile new governments in Iraq, Egypt, Libya, and others… Not to mention the vilified Iran and the borderless entity of Al Qaeda with its fingers in all of these pies. It’s quite a list, and it’s meant to intimidate us, the same way the Soviet Union, and its Warsaw Pact allies did for 40 years. Like with the communists, the Islamists are a monster created by the west. Both were propped up, supported, armed, and welcomed as allies against old enemies. The Communists were our main ally and front line soldiers against the fascists, then the Islamists played the same roll against the communists. Convenient.

This isn’t to say that Islamist extremists aren’t dangerous, or that we should leave them alone. Not at all! They’re crazier than a bag of Slinkies.

BUT, it’s a losing battle without reason!!! It’s time to reassess what we are doing about it. Fighting conventional wars against a religious fanaticism is a lost cause. Whether you are using swords and spears, as they did during the Crusades, or the Drones and missiles the US currently employs. At best you can hold the line, and maintain tense occupation of territory. Unless or until a new enemy develops that scares both sides into cooperating, this is all conventional power will ever achieve in the Islamic world… A few friendly Islamic governments that tolerate the west as long as the personal gain is appropriate, and a roiling general anti-western sentiment among the population that spawns a constant stream of militant zealots.

With all the might that the greatest military power the world has ever seen can bring to bear, we are still fighting terrorism with one hand tied behind our backs. That doesn’t mean we should increase military spending or institute the draft. There is a far cheaper weapon at our disposal which has been kept off the battlefield. Education… reason… rational thought.

The western powers are not attacking the root cause of the disease, the irrational blind faith in supernatural legends; the brainwashing that allows imams to convince young Muslims to sacrifice their lives for the faith. We have to tolerate it, even support it... because it’s no different than the delusions of a large segment of our own population. We support all religions through tax free status, and public acceptance. We placate the religious. If we equate this to fighting a pandemic, we are simply treating the worst symptoms by fighting terrorists. We can’t cure the disease until we admit we suffer from a slightly different variety ourselves.

It’s time to change our ways. We can maintain freedom without sponsoring delusions. Revoke tax free status for religions. Why is this necessary? Stop incorporating fantasies into public events. Education needs to be refocused on critical thinking. When we stop placating nonsense at home, we can then avoid at least this flavour of hypocrisy in our foreign policy. Stop treating theocratic dictatorships with legitimacy and feigning understanding and tolerance when they base their policies on superstition. Hold them accountable for human rights regardless of scriptural foundations for discrimination.

We can’t allow the religious in our country to use ancient superstitions to justify discriminating against our own citizens based on gender and sexual orientation, and retain any moral authority in condemning any action abroad based on a different flavour of superstition.

If in Mali, and all nations of the world, the general population was taught to question the validity of religions, to think rationally and critically, then maybe, possibly, over time, the base from which the radicals draw their fodder for war would decrease. If we stopped venerating the Pope in public, giving him equal regards with world leaders; then perhaps the Imams would slowly lose some of their lustre.

No longer can we tolerate anyone splitting hairs with an argument that Christians aren’t as bad as Muslims. No longer can we remain silent when leaders base their arguments on an irrational premise.

This is a very long term fix, but we need to start. For the status quo is killing us. Don’t take it anymore, neither at home nor abroad.  It’s time to use our best weapon against terrorism… questions and reason.
It’s time to cry Bullshit, and restrain the dogs of war!!

Sunday, January 6, 2013

The Trouble With Angels

It's funny how the mind can hold contradictory ideas without perceiving any problem. There is a fundamentally misleading label given to the abrahamic religions (Christianity, Judaism, Islam). They are separated from other ancient religions as Monotheistic. Other cultures in the ancient world had a pantheon of gods. From Egyptians to Vikings, Aztecs to Hindus, they all had a cast of characters with distinct personalities and specialties. These are the Polytheistic religions. 

If you spent any time in church growing up, then like me, you might have come to think of these religions as cute ancient superstitions. They had small 'g' gods who fought and did silly things. Legends, no better than fairy tails.

As Christians (or insert your monotheistic flavor), we followed the one true God (capital G). This is a point of pride, a differentiator. We were the more mature, the more logical religion. Simple. 

So based on the title, you know where I'm going with this. It's amazing how Christians can ignore such a blatant contradiction. 

What is an angel? In the back of my bible, in the compendium, it is defined as: "human or superhuman agent or messenger of God".
Superhuman? But not a god? Right there in my bible. with not so much as a 'by your leave' or nudge nudge, wink wink.
Similarly dictionary.com has:
an·gel  [eyn-juh l]  
noun
1. one of a class of spiritual beings; a celestial attendant of God. In medieval angelology, angels constituted the lowest of the nine celestial orders (seraphim, cherubim, thrones, dominations or dominions, virtues, powers, principalities or princedoms, archangels, and angels).
2. a conventional representation of such a being, in human form, with wings, usually in white robes.

Churches are filled with images of angels, they are played by children in the manger scene at the Christmas pageant, and many talk about their guardian angel. I remember it being said many times in sermons that there is a celestial battle being waged constantly between angels and demons for each soul. So cool! Who doesn't love a good supernatural battle. I wonder if it's like Gandalf and Saruman in lord of the rings, or more like the Avengers movie? No, it couldn't be avengers, because that had Thor and Loki, and they're from one of the silly polytheistic religions. 

So we have these beings, these living creatures, who reside in heaven with God, they live forever, can visit earth in various forms, fly, be invisibly, fight, an oh yes... Most importantly of all, they have free will. Wait!?! Isn't that a special gift to humanity? Why God created men? Maybe, maybe not. We'll leave that be for now. 


But how do we know they have free will? Easy. There are four named Angels in the bible. The rest are simply referred to generically or as messengers, and of course many of the 227 references to angels in the bible (http://www.raphael.net/scripture/angels.htm) could just be to people who perform angelic acts. The other definitions: 
"3. a messenger, especially of God.
4. a person who performs a mission of God or acts as if sent by God: an angel of mercy.
5. a person having qualities generally attributed to an angel, as beauty, purity, or kindliness."

...the named angels are:
1. Michael-(Daniel 10:13,21 & 12:1, also Jude 9 and Revelation 12:7)
2. Gabriel-(Luke 1:19,26)
3. Satan or Lucifer-(Isaiah 14:12, and Ezekiel 28:11-19)
4. Abaddon-(Revelation 9:11)

So Satan and the demons (fallen angels) who followed him either rebelled against god of their own free will or act as the agents of god, meaning the creation of temptation, evil, etc... Suits Gods purpose.

We could also go into detail on the trinity (which is never explained in the new testament and is wholly -not holy- the creation of bishops to sell the faith. And the half human son of the chief god, like Hercules...

This has all been a matter of theological debate for 2 millennia now, and doesn't matter one fig, because if you are paying attention, you will see the nut of the problem... A cast of supernatural (godlike) characters with their own personalities and purposes.

Polytheism. So why do we think of it as any different from Zeus, Athena, Aries, Hades, and Apollo? A great marketing strategy devised by early church leaders, and 1800 years of branding, whereby not buying the brand often meant at best being shunned socially, at worst a gruesome death.

Moderate and fundamental Christians, Muslims, and Jews alike, just assume their god is the only god. And even when they talk about the archangel Gabriel at the gates of heaven, it is without the slightest sense of irony.

I could have titled this bog 'the elephant in the room'. Because it is so patently obvious. Yet if you show this to a believer, they will likely just roll there eyes and maybe offer a derisive comment about unfair attacks on Christianity. 

Conditioned to accept without thinking, they follow an ancient superstition every bit as silly as the halls of valhalla and the flying Valkyries. 

Fairy tales full of fairies.